🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," stated the MEP driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that states around the world are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.